When using GenAI, be sure to cite your usage.
Make sure to check your professor's syllabus and assignment details for information about when and how to use AI!
Generative AI is great for brainstorming, summarizing, and tutoring, but it’s not a substitute for verified academic sources.
Search engines help locate a wide range of content but require careful evaluation of credibility.
Library databases are the gold standard for scholarly research, offering peer-reviewed, citable sources.
Remember: If you are not an expert (or at least somewhat knowledgeable) on a topic, you cannot expect or trust AI to be
|
|
Generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) |
Search Engine (e.g., Google) |
Library Database (e.g., JSTOR, EBSCO) |
|
Purpose |
Synthesizes information, generates summaries, answers, or drafts based on training data |
Finds web pages or documents based on keyword relevance |
Provides access to peer-reviewed, curated academic sources |
|
Source Transparency |
Often opaque – doesn’t cite sources unless prompted |
Links to sources (maybe), but quality varies |
Clear citations and source metadata |
|
Accuracy & Reliability |
May hallucinate or fabricate information, responsibility on user to evaluate reliability |
Depends on website credibility, responsibility on user to evaluate reliability |
High reliability – scholarly and peer-reviewed |
|
Depth of Content |
Can provide synthesized overviews or explanations |
Varies – from superficial blog posts to well-researched articles |
Deep, specialized academic content |
|
Search Method |
Conversational – you ask questions and get synthesized responses |
Keyword-based – you scan results manually |
Structured search – filters by discipline, date, type, etc. (Booleans) |
|
Learning Support |
Can explain concepts, rephrase, tutor-style interaction |
Limited – mostly links to external content |
Limited – assumes user reads and interprets academic texts |
|
Citation Use |
Doesn’t automatically cite sources unless asked |
May link to sources, but not formatted citations |
Provides full citations and often export tools for citation management |
|
Bias & Scope |
Based on training data – may reflect biases or gaps |
Biased by SEO, popularity, and ad-driven content |
Curated for academic rigor and diversity of perspectives |
|
Use Cases |
Brainstorming, summarizing, drafting, tutoring |
Finding general info, news, or public-facing content |
Conducting formal academic research, literature reviews, sourcing evidence |
Across the board, academic database providers are weaving AI into their services in 2025, but each in a way that aligns with their platform’s purpose:
In all cases, the goal is to save researchers time and effort while preserving accuracy and scholarly integrity. Users should always remain critical thinkers – the AI tools provide assistance, not absolute answers – but when used wisely, these features can significantly enhance the research experience, from quickly screening hundreds of papers to engaging interactively with a single book chapter. Each database’s approach to AI offers unique strengths, and together they point toward a future where scholarly research is more efficient and richly supported by “intelligent” tools.
AI integration in academic databases falls into a few key categories:
| Database/Platform | AI Feature(s) | Details/Examples |
|---|---|---|
| EBSCOhost & EBSCO Discovery |
AI Insights (Summaries) |
|
| ProQuest (Clarivate) |
Research Assistant |
The ProQuest Research Assistant is an AI-powered helper embedded in ProQuest Central and other Clarivate academic platforms. Within any full-text document, it provides a “Key Takeaway” summary of the text, explains important terms or concepts in that document (with definitions and why they’re important), and offers “next step” suggestions. It can also recommend new research topics related to the document, giving users pre-formulated search queries to explore with one click. These features act as a guided research aid rather than just a chatbot – helping students understand content and discover more, while upholding academic integrity (no un-sourced answers). Clarivate has rolled out similar assistants in Web of Science, Ebook Central, and other products. |
| JSTOR |
Interactive AI Tool |
JSTOR’s Interactive Research Tool (beta) uses AI to let users engage in a conversation with JSTOR content. When viewing a journal article, book chapter, etc., users can do several AI-driven actions: get a summary of the item’s main points, ask questions in natural language about that specific text (the tool’s answers are based only on that source’s content), and find related content (it suggests similar articles/chapters). Essentially, it’s like having a specialized research chatbot that “has read” the article and can answer your questions or point you to further readings. This helps especially with dense scholarly texts – students can clarify concepts or significance via a quick Q&A. Users need to create a free JSTOR account to access and use the tool. (The tool was piloted in 2023 and expanded to more institutions in 2024, and is expected to reach all JSTOR users in 2025.) |
| ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
ScienceDirect AI
|
ScienceDirect AI is Elsevier’s new generative AI integration (launched March 2025) that serves as a research companion on the ScienceDirect platform. Key features include: Ask ScienceDirect – a cross-document search that uses generative AI to answer research questions by pulling from 14+ million full-text articles and book chapters, returning an instant summary with citations and even snippet excerpts from the sources.
|
| Gale Platforms (Cengage) |
Topic Finder (Visual NLP) |
Gale’s products (e.g., Academic OneFile, General OneFile, etc.) include AI-driven tools focused more on exploration and analysis rather than generative answers.
These Lab tools have been around since 2018–2019 and emphasize responsible, transparent use of AI/NLP on content. |
Content was developed using responses generated with Copilot Researcher using two prompts: "use this list of databases https://libguides.xavier.edu/az.php to find which ones have added language to their sites and contracts about artificial intelligence" and "what AI features each of these databases now include?"
The Library does not endorse any specific AI technologies, and encourages users to be cautious about sharing personal information when using AI tools.
For example:
You are a Google Cloud program manager (1). Draft an executive summary email to (2) [persona] based on [details about relevant program docs] (3). Limit to bullet points (4)
